getting: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, revenge
Weight: 0.39
, time
Weight: 0.38
, challenge
Weight: 0.37
, problem
Weight: 0.37
Siblings get
Weight: 0.31
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality change 0.86
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(revenge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(revenge, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(revenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(revenge, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(revenge, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(revenge, has quality sin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(revenge, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(revenge, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenge, has quality sin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(revenge, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(revenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(revenge, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(giving, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(getting, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(getting, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(getting, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(getting, has quality change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(getting, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(getting, has quality sin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(getting, has quality sin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality sin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality sin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(getting, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality sin)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(getting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality sin)