getting: is mortal sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, revenge
Weight: 0.39
, time
Weight: 0.38
, challenge
Weight: 0.37
, problem
Weight: 0.37
Siblings get
Weight: 0.31
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is mortal sin 1.00
has quality sin 0.87
is sin catholic 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(revenge, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(getting, is mortal sin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(revenge, has quality sin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenge, has quality sin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(revenge, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(getting, is mortal sin)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(getting, is sin catholic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(getting, is sin catholic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(getting, is sin catholic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(getting, is sin catholic)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(getting, has quality sin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(getting, has quality sin)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(getting, has quality sin)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(getting, has quality sin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(getting, is mortal sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality sin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(getting, is mortal sin)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(revenge, has quality sin)