ghana: is less developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nigeria
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.57
, south africa
Weight: 0.57
, nation
Weight: 0.56
, europe
Weight: 0.55
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.35
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, malta
Weight: 0.35
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, spain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less developed 1.00
is less developed country 0.94
is developed 0.90
is less economic developed country 0.85
is developed country 0.85
is developing 0.79
be considered developing country 0.78
is economic developed country 0.77
is less country 0.76
is developing country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(europe, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developing country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(malta, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(europe, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(europe, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(malta, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(latin america, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(malta, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(malta, is developed country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(malta, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(malta, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(malta, is developing country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ghana, is less developed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less economic developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ghana, is less economic developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less economic developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ghana, is less developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ghana, is less developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ghana, is less economic developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ghana, is economic developed country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ghana, be considered developing country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, is developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is developing country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ghana, be considered developing country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ghana, be considered developing country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ghana, is developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ghana, be considered developing country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ghana, is developing country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ghana, is developing country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ghana, is developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ghana, is less developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(malta, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(malta, is developing country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(europe, is developed country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(europe, is developed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ghana, is less developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)