giant panda: be called giant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called giant 1.00
be called giant pandas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called giant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called giant pandas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(panda, be called giant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(panda, be called giant pandas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(giant panda, be called giant)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(giant panda, be called giant pandas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(panda, be called giant)