giant panda: be called giant pandas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called giant pandas 1.00
be called pandas 0.95
be called giant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called giant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called pandas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(panda, be called pandas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(panda, be called giant)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(panda, be called giant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(giant panda, be called giant pandas)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(giant panda, be called giant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called giant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red panda, be called pandas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(panda, be called pandas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(panda, be called giant)