giant panda: be important to chinese

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to chinese 1.00
be important to china 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda, be important to china)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(panda bear, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be important to china)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(panda, be important to china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(panda, be important to china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to chinese)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be important to china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(giant panda, be important to china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be important to chinese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(panda bear, be important to china)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be important to chinese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(panda, be important to china)