giant panda: be in danger becoming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger becoming 1.00
be in danger 0.88
become extinced 0.78
be under threat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be in danger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(spider monkey, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be in danger)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(panda, be under threat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(giant panda, become extinced)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(giant panda, become extinced)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(giant panda, become extinced)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(giant panda, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(giant panda, be under threat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, become extinced)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orangutan, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(spider monkey, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)