giant panda: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(species, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(species, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(species, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(species, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(red panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giant panda, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(giant panda, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(species, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(giant panda, be related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(species, be related)