giant panda: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, endangered species
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84
be in danger becoming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(panda, be under threat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(red panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in danger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(panda, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(orangutan, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(orangutan, be in danger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(spider monkey, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be in danger)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda, be in danger becoming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(panda, be in danger becoming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(giant panda, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(giant panda, be in danger)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be in danger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger becoming)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giant panda, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(giant panda, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panda, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orangutan, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panda, be in danger becoming)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(spider monkey, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(giant panda, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)