giant: be portrayed as man eaters

Related concepts

Parents	grocery store Weight: 0.64 , monster Weight: 0.62 , company Weight: 0.61 , team Weight: 0.56 , brand Weight: 0.54
Siblings	siemens Weight: 0.59 , boeing Weight: 0.57 , cyclops Weight: 0.53 , mitsubishi Weight: 0.50 , aetna Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be portrayed as man eaters	1.00
be depicted as slow	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(giant, be portrayed as man eaters)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(giant, be depicted as slow)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(giant, be depicted as slow)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(giant, be depicted as slow)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(giant, be depicted as slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(giant, be portrayed as man eaters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(giant, be portrayed as man eaters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(giant, be portrayed as man eaters)