giant: be stars star in way

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, monster
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, team
Weight: 0.56
, brand
Weight: 0.54
Siblings siemens
Weight: 0.59
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, cyclops
Weight: 0.53
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.50
, aetna
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stars star in way 1.00
be stars star 0.98
be stars common star in way 0.96
be stars most common star in way 0.94
be stars common star 0.94
be stars most common star 0.93
be stars star in milky way 0.91
is star red 0.89
has shape stars 0.89
be stars common star in milky way 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(giant, be stars star in way)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giant, be stars common star in way)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giant, be stars common star in way)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(giant, be stars most common star in way)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(giant, be stars common star in way)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(giant, is star red)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(giant, be stars star in milky way)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(giant, is star red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giant, has shape stars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(giant, be stars common star in milky way)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(giant, be stars star in milky way)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, be stars most common star in way)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(giant, be stars most common star in way)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(giant, has shape stars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(giant, has shape stars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(giant, be stars most common star in way)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(giant, is star red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(giant, be stars common star in way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(giant, be stars star in milky way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(giant, be stars star in milky way)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(giant, is star red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(giant, be stars common star in milky way)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(giant, be stars common star in milky way)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(giant, be stars common star in milky way)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(giant, has shape stars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(giant, be stars star in way)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(giant, be stars star in way)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giant, be stars star in way)