gift: be at gift shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.69
, surprise
Weight: 0.63
, gift shop
Weight: 0.62
, donation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings candy
Weight: 0.69
, kindness
Weight: 0.68
, dinner
Weight: 0.66
, compassion
Weight: 0.66
, free will
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at gift shop 1.00
be at shop 0.87
be money or traditional gift 0.81
be at store 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at shop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(candy, be at shop)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(candy, be at shop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(candy, be at store)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(candy, be at store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(gift, be at gift shop)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gift, be at shop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gift, be money or traditional gift)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at shop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gift, be money or traditional gift)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(gift, be at shop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gift, be money or traditional gift)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gift, be at shop)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gift, be money or traditional gift)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gift, be at gift shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candy, be at shop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gift, be at gift shop)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(candy, be at store)