gift: be in paper gift bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gesture
Weight: 0.69
, blessing
Weight: 0.66
, surprise
Weight: 0.63
, donation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings candy
Weight: 0.69
, kindness
Weight: 0.68
, dinner
Weight: 0.66
, compassion
Weight: 0.66
, free will
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in paper gift bags 1.00
be considered gift 0.83
be seen as gift 0.82
be most important gift from god 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(free will, be considered gift)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(free will, be seen as gift)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(free will, be most important gift from god)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(free will, be considered gift)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(free will, be considered gift)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(free will, be seen as gift)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(free will, be seen as gift)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(free will, be most important gift from god)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(free will, be most important gift from god)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(gift, be in paper gift bags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gift, be in paper gift bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(free will, be considered gift)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(free will, be seen as gift)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gift, be in paper gift bags)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(free will, be most important gift from god)