gin: be served in teacups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.66
, cocktail
Weight: 0.60
, spirit
Weight: 0.57
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings lager
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, cider
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, rum
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served in teacups 1.00
be served in glass 0.81
be served in large glass 0.80
be served with 2 straws 0.77
be served in snifter 0.77
be served in brandy balloon 0.75
be in china 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gin, be served in teacups)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(brandy, be served in snifter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(gin, be served in teacups)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(gin, be served in glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gin, be served in large glass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(gin, be served in large glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in large glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gin, be served in glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gin, be served in large glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gin, be served in teacups)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(brandy, be served in brandy balloon)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(gin, be served in teacups)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cocktail, be served with 2 straws)