giraffe: have long tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings wildebeest
Weight: 0.53
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tongues 1.00
has tongues 0.96
do have tongues 0.96
have long blue tongues 0.96
get tongues 0.96
have black tongues 0.94
have blue tongues 0.93
has shape tongues 0.93
has physical part tongues 0.93
get black tongues 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(giraffe, have long tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(giraffe, has physical part tongues)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(giraffe, has physical part tongues)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giraffe, has physical part tongues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, has physical part tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(giraffe, have blue tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(giraffe, have blue tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(giraffe, have long tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giraffe, have long tongues)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)