girl: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.84
, girl scout
Weight: 0.74
, boy
Weight: 0.71
, child
Weight: 0.66
Siblings niece
Weight: 0.72
, sister
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.66
, mary
Weight: 0.65
, baby
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be at office supply store 0.82
be at grocery store 0.80
be at toy store 0.77
be at shop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(boy, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(girl, be at department store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(boy, be at toy store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(boy, be at toy store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(boy, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(girl, be at department store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(girl, be at department store)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at office supply store)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(girl, be at office supply store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(girl, be at office supply store)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(girl, be at grocery store)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(girl, be at toy store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(girl, be at grocery store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at grocery store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(girl, be at shop)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(girl, be at grocery store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(girl, be at toy store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(girl, be at office supply store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(girl, be at shop)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(girl, be at toy store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(girl, be at shop)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at toy store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(girl, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boy, be at toy store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(girl, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boy, be at toy store)