girl: be physically superior in beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.84
, girl scout
Weight: 0.74
, boy
Weight: 0.71
, child
Weight: 0.66
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.68
, elizabeth
Weight: 0.67
, daughter
Weight: 0.66
, mary
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be physically superior in beauty 1.00
be focused on beauty 0.79
differ physically from boy 0.76
is beautiful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(daughter, is beautiful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(daughter, is beautiful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(daughter, is beautiful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(girl, be physically superior in beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(girl, be focused on beauty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(girl, be focused on beauty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(girl, be focused on beauty)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(girl, be focused on beauty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(girl, is beautiful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(girl, is beautiful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(girl, is beautiful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(girl, is beautiful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(girl, be physically superior in beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(girl, be physically superior in beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(girl, be physically superior in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(daughter, is beautiful)