giving: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, service
Weight: 0.48
, information
Weight: 0.47
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, let
Weight: 0.32
, turning
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, finding
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
be to good 0.82
feel good 0.80
is bad luck 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
be to poor good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(giving, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(giving, is bad luck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(giving, is bad luck)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad luck)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(giving, is bad luck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giving, be to good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(giving, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(giving, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, be to poor good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(giving, be to poor good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(giving, be to poor good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(giving, be to good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(giving, feel good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(giving, be to good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(giving, feel good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giving, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giving, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)