glacier: melt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.61
, ice
Weight: 0.58
, park
Weight: 0.58
, world
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.34
, ice cream
Weight: 0.33
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.33
, death valley
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
melt 1.00
melt bad 0.96
melt in antarctica 0.93
melt problem 0.92
be melt problem 0.92
melt away today 0.91
melt away in world 0.90
melt from bottom 0.89
melt at bottom 0.89
melt faster today 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ice, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(glacier, melt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ice, melt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ice, melt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, melt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ice, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(glacier, melt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ice cream, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ice cream, melt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(glacier, melt)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt away in world)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(glacier, melt away in world)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(glacier, melt away in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(glacier, melt away in world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(glacier, melt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ice, melt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ice cream, melt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(glacier, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ice, melt)