gladiator: was important to ancient rome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.63
, movie
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.55
, sword
Weight: 0.54
Siblings warrior
Weight: 0.34
, knight
Weight: 0.34
, samurai
Weight: 0.33
, avenger
Weight: 0.33
, batman
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to ancient rome 1.00
was important to rome 0.91
be part of ancient rome cultures 0.91
be part of rome cultures 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(gladiator, was important to rome)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gladiator, was important to rome)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gladiator, be part of rome cultures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gladiator, be part of rome cultures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(gladiator, was important to rome)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, was important to rome)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, be part of rome cultures)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(gladiator, be part of rome cultures)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, be part of ancient rome cultures)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gladiator, be part of ancient rome cultures)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(gladiator, be part of ancient rome cultures)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(gladiator, be part of ancient rome cultures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(gladiator, was important to ancient rome)