glass bottle: have labels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents glass
Weight: 0.81
, item
Weight: 0.64
, metal
Weight: 0.62
, trash
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings wine bottle
Weight: 0.86
, shot glass
Weight: 0.42
, broken glass
Weight: 0.40
, bottled water
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have labels 1.00
is labels 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, is labels)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(wine bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have labels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wine bottle, is labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, is labels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(glass bottle, have labels)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, is labels)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, is labels)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(glass bottle, is labels)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is labels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(glass bottle, have labels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have labels)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, have labels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wine bottle, is labels)