glass: be bad conductor of electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents safety glass
Weight: 0.74
, barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings windshield
Weight: 0.35
, liquid water
Weight: 0.34
, liquid crystal
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum
Weight: 0.34
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad conductor of electricity 1.00
is electric conductor 0.90
be bad conductor of heat 0.90
be poor conductor of heat 0.88
is better conductor 0.88
be better conductor of heat 0.88
is conductor 0.88
be better conductor than argon 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(liquid, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(glass, be bad conductor of electricity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(liquid, be poor conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(liquid, be poor conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(liquid, be poor conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(glass, be bad conductor of electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of heat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(glass, be bad conductor of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(glass, be bad conductor of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(glass, be bad conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(liquid, be poor conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aluminum, is conductor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(glass, be bad conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(liquid, be poor conductor of heat)