glass: be good insulator for ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents safety glass
Weight: 0.74
, barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings windshield
Weight: 0.35
, liquid water
Weight: 0.34
, liquid crystal
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum
Weight: 0.34
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good insulator for ice 1.00
be good insulator 0.95
is good insulator 0.95
is bad insulator 0.94
be insulator 0.93
is insulator 0.93
is good heat insulator 0.93
is heat insulator 0.91
be best insulator for metal wire 0.87
is good insulators 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(glass, be good insulator for ice)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(glass, is insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(glass, is good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(glass, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(glass, is insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(glass, is good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(glass, is good insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(glass, is insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(glass, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(glass, be good insulator for ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(glass, be good insulator for ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(glass, be good insulator for ice)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good insulator)