glass: be pretty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.64
, wall
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.81
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.74
, skylight
Weight: 0.60
, petri dish
Weight: 0.58
, test tube
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pretty 1.00
be used to see good 0.77
be used to look good 0.76
become solid by cool it 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(liquid, become solid by cool it)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glass, be pretty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(liquid, become solid by cool it)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(liquid, become solid by cool it)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(liquid, become solid by cool it)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(glass, be pretty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(glass, be pretty)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(glass, be used to look good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(glass, be used to see good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(glass, be used to see good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(glass, be used to see good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(glass, be used to look good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(glass, be used to look good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(glass, be used to see good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(glass, be used to look good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(glass, be pretty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glass, be pretty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(liquid, become solid by cool it)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(glass, be pretty)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(liquid, become solid by cool it)