glider: have long wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, plane
Weight: 0.52
, aircraft
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.50
Siblings jet plane
Weight: 0.33
, helicopter
Weight: 0.33
, kite
Weight: 0.33
, tractor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long wings 1.00
have wings instead of short wings 0.96
have wings instead of wings 0.94
has physical part wings 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(plane, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glider, have long wings)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aircraft, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glider, have long wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(aircraft, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(plane, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(plane, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(plane, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(glider, have long wings)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(aircraft, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(glider, have long wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(helicopter, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(helicopter, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(glider, have long wings)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glider, have wings instead of short wings)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(glider, has physical part wings)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(glider, have wings instead of short wings)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(glider, has physical part wings)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(glider, have wings instead of wings)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(glider, has physical part wings)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(glider, have wings instead of short wings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(glider, have wings instead of wings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(glider, has physical part wings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(glider, have wings instead of short wings)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(glider, have wings instead of wings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(glider, have wings instead of wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glider, have long wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(aircraft, has physical part wings)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(plane, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(helicopter, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(aircraft, has physical part wings)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glider, have long wings)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(plane, has physical part wings)