global warming: affect wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect wildlife 1.00
affect arctic wildlife 0.93
affect habitats of animals 0.87
affect animals 0.85
affect wildife 0.85
affect habitats 0.84
affect biodiversity 0.82
affect flora 0.82
affect forest 0.81
affect marine biome 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(global warming, affect wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(global warming, affect animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(global warming, affect animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(global warming, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(global warming, affect wildlife)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)