global warming: be damaging

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crisis
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nuclear war
Weight: 0.65
, arctic
Weight: 0.51
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, computer science
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be damaging 1.00
be to harmful 0.79
cause major damage 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(global warming, be damaging)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(global warming, be to harmful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(global warming, be to harmful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(global warming, be to harmful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(global warming, cause major damage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(global warming, cause major damage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be to harmful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(global warming, cause major damage)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(global warming, cause major damage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be damaging)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(global warming, be damaging) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(global warming, be damaging)