globe: be more accurate than map projection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents planet
Weight: 0.57
, sphere
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, paper
Weight: 0.54
Siblings earth
Weight: 0.62
, planet earth
Weight: 0.35
, terrestrial planet
Weight: 0.31
, nation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more accurate than map projection 1.00
be more accurate than projection map 1.00
be more accurate than flat projection map 0.98
be more accurate than map 0.93
be accurate than map 0.93
be more accurate than flat map 0.92
be more accurate than maps 0.91
is more accurate 0.87
be more useful than flat map 0.85
be more useful than map 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than projection map)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than projection map)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than map)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than projection map)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than projection map)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(globe, be accurate than map)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(globe, be accurate than map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(globe, be more accurate than map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than flat map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than flat projection map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(globe, be accurate than map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(globe, be accurate than map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than maps)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(globe, is more accurate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(globe, is more accurate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(globe, be more useful than map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(globe, be more useful than flat map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more useful than map)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(globe, be more useful than map)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(globe, be more useful than map)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(globe, is more accurate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(globe, is more accurate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(globe, be more accurate than map projection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(globe, be more accurate than map projection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(globe, be more accurate than map projection)