glyph: hack in ingress

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.48
, mark
Weight: 0.45
, character
Weight: 0.45
, image
Weight: 0.43
, system
Weight: 0.42
Siblings dragon
Weight: 0.30
, pentagram
Weight: 0.30
, medusa
Weight: 0.30
, freebsd
Weight: 0.30
, crucifix
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack in ingress 1.00
is hacking ingress 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(glyph, hack in ingress)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(glyph, is hacking ingress)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(glyph, is hacking ingress)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glyph, is hacking ingress)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glyph, is hacking ingress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(glyph, hack in ingress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(glyph, hack in ingress)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glyph, hack in ingress)