glyph: is hacking ingress

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.48
, mark
Weight: 0.45
, character
Weight: 0.45
, image
Weight: 0.43
, system
Weight: 0.42
Siblings dragon
Weight: 0.30
, pentagram
Weight: 0.30
, medusa
Weight: 0.30
, freebsd
Weight: 0.30
, crucifix
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hacking ingress 1.00
hack in ingress 0.94
is hacking 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(glyph, is hacking ingress)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(glyph, hack in ingress)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(glyph, hack in ingress)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(glyph, hack in ingress)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(glyph, is hacking)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(glyph, is hacking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(glyph, hack in ingress)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(glyph, is hacking)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(glyph, is hacking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glyph, is hacking ingress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(glyph, is hacking ingress)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(glyph, is hacking ingress)