gnat: be bad year 2016

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, insect
Weight: 0.51
, bug
Weight: 0.45
, bird
Weight: 0.44
Siblings housefly
Weight: 0.33
, beast
Weight: 0.33
, wasp
Weight: 0.33
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, lizard
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 2018 1.00
be bad year 1.00
be bad year 2016 1.00
be bad year 2017 1.00
be bad in fall 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wasp, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wasp, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad year)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad year 2017)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad year 2018)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gnat, be bad year)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2017)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(gnat, be bad year)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2017)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(gnat, be bad year 2017)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(gnat, be bad year 2018)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad in fall)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gnat, be bad in fall)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(gnat, be bad in fall)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad in fall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gnat, be bad year 2016)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gnat, be bad year 2016) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wasp, be bad year)