goal: set important in job search

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field goal
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings target
Weight: 0.62
, survival
Weight: 0.59
, retribution
Weight: 0.59
, fitness
Weight: 0.58
, hat trick
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
set important in job search 1.00
set important to job search 1.00
set important to successful job search 0.97
set important for business 0.79
set important in business 0.79
be set at work 0.79
set important in counselling 0.78
set good 0.76
work in hardpoint 0.75
work in nmz 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(target, be set at work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, set important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(target, set important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, set important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(target, be set at work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be set at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(goal, set important in job search)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(goal, set important to successful job search)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(goal, set important to successful job search)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(goal, set important to successful job search)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(goal, set important for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(goal, set important for business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(goal, set important in counselling)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(goal, set important in counselling)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(goal, set important for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(goal, set good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(goal, set good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(goal, set important in counselling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(goal, set good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important to successful job search)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in counselling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(goal, set good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(goal, set important in job search)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be set at work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important in job search)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, set important in business)