goalie: clear crease

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hockey player
Weight: 0.64
, player
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.48
, defense
Weight: 0.46
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.36
, quarterback
Weight: 0.35
, hockey game
Weight: 0.34
, football player
Weight: 0.34
, linebacker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
clear crease 1.00
be go after puck 0.79
be go to hit puck 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, be go after puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(goalie, clear crease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hockey player, be go to hit puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(goalie, clear crease)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be go to hit puck)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be go to hit puck)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, be go after puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(goalie, clear crease)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hockey player, be go to hit puck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(goalie, clear crease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(goalie, clear crease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goalie, clear crease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(goalie, clear crease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go to hit puck)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go after puck)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(goalie, clear crease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hockey player, be go to hit puck)