goggles: be made of plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, accessory
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings helmet
Weight: 0.33
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, gear
Weight: 0.32
, thong
Weight: 0.32
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of plastic 1.00
be made 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mask, be made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(helmet, be made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mask, be made)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mask, be made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(helmet, be made)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(helmet, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(goggles, be made of plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(goggles, be made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(goggles, be made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(goggles, be made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(goggles, be made of plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mask, be made)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(goggles, be made of plastic)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(helmet, be made)