goggles: fog up swimming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, accessory
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
Siblings helmet
Weight: 0.33
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, gear
Weight: 0.32
, thong
Weight: 0.32
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
fog up swimming 1.00
fog 0.87
swim swim invented 0.80
get foggy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(mask, fog)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(mask, fog)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mask, fog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(goggles, fog up swimming)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(goggles, swim swim invented)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(goggles, fog)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(goggles, fog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(goggles, swim swim invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(goggles, get foggy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(goggles, fog)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(goggles, get foggy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(goggles, get foggy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(goggles, fog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(goggles, swim swim invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(goggles, swim swim invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(goggles, get foggy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(goggles, fog up swimming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goggles, fog up swimming)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mask, fog)