going: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.48
, song
Weight: 0.48
, right
Weight: 0.48
, time
Weight: 0.48
, factor
Weight: 0.46
Siblings do
Weight: 0.32
, okay
Weight: 0.32
, everybody
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad thing 0.79
is early bad 0.78
is late bad 0.78
is bad luck 0.76
is mad bad 0.76
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75
be on bad idea 0.75
is angry bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(right, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(going, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(right, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(right, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(right, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(going, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(going, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(going, is angry bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(going, is angry bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(going, is angry bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(going, is bad luck)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(going, is mad bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(going, is angry bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(going, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(going, is mad bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(going, is bad luck)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(going, is early bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(going, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(going, is bad luck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(going, is early bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(going, is late bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(going, is late bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(going, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(going, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(going, is mad bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(going, is mad bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(going, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(going, is late bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(going, is early bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(going, is late bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(going, is early bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(going, feel good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(going, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(going, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(going, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(right, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(going, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(right, has quality bad)