going: is bad luck

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light
Weight: 0.48
, song
Weight: 0.48
, right
Weight: 0.48
, time
Weight: 0.48
, factor
Weight: 0.46
Siblings do
Weight: 0.32
, okay
Weight: 0.32
, everybody
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad luck 1.00
is bad thing 0.79
is mad bad 0.78
is early bad 0.77
be on bad idea 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
is late bad 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(right, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(going, is bad luck)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(right, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(right, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(right, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(going, is bad luck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(going, is bad luck)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(going, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(going, is mad bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(going, is mad bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(going, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(going, is late bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(going, is early bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(going, is mad bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(going, is early bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(going, is mad bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(going, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(going, is late bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(going, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(going, is late bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(going, is early bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(going, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(going, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(going, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(going, is early bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(going, is late bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad luck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(going, is bad luck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(right, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(going, is bad luck)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(right, has quality bad)