gold: be dent by person tooth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.70
, medal
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
Siblings emerald
Weight: 0.54
, silver
Weight: 0.39
, copper
Weight: 0.38
, zinc
Weight: 0.35
, diamond
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dent by person tooth 1.00
be at tooth 0.79
be used to tooth repair 0.77
be used to fill in tooth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(silver, be used to fill in tooth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(silver, be used to fill in tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(silver, be used to fill in tooth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(gold, be dent by person tooth)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(gold, be at tooth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(gold, be at tooth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(gold, be used to tooth repair)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gold, be at tooth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(gold, be used to tooth repair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gold, be used to tooth repair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gold, be at tooth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gold, be used to tooth repair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(gold, be dent by person tooth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gold, be dent by person tooth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(gold, be dent by person tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silver, be used to fill in tooth)