golden gate bridge: be considered landmark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents landmark
Weight: 0.68
, sight
Weight: 0.67
, attraction
Weight: 0.64
, bridge
Weight: 0.64
, toll road
Weight: 0.63
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.66
, brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.36
, great barrier reef
Weight: 0.34
, pier
Weight: 0.34
, river
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered landmark 1.00
is important landmark 0.95
is national landmark 0.92
has physical part landmark 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(golden gate bridge, is important landmark)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(golden gate bridge, is national landmark)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golden gate bridge, is important landmark)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, is important landmark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(golden gate bridge, is national landmark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, is national landmark)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, is important landmark)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, is national landmark)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, has physical part landmark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be considered landmark)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has physical part landmark)