golden retriever: dig holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents retriever
Weight: 0.78
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, dog
Weight: 0.72
, puppy
Weight: 0.62
Siblings labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.38
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37
, small dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
dig holes 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golden retriever, dig holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(retriever, dig holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(retriever, dig holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, dig holes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, dig holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, dig holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(golden retriever, dig holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golden retriever, dig holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(retriever, dig holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, dig holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(golden retriever, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(retriever, dig holes)