golf ball: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ball
Weight: 0.73
, golf club
Weight: 0.70
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, golfing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings tennis ball
Weight: 0.80
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.41
, cue ball
Weight: 0.40
, bowling ball
Weight: 0.39
, ball bearing
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better than others 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(golf ball, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(golf ball, has quality good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(golf ball, be better than others)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, be better than others)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(golf ball, be better than others)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, be better than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)