golf club: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.80
, golf
Weight: 0.71
, sport
Weight: 0.71
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.70
Siblings golf ball
Weight: 0.70
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.69
, putter
Weight: 0.67
, golfer
Weight: 0.49
, golf course
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(golf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(club, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(club, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(golf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(golf club, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(golf club, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(golf club, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)