golf: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, tournament
Weight: 0.59
, baseball
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golf club
Weight: 0.71
, golf course
Weight: 0.38
, golfing
Weight: 0.37
, professional football
Weight: 0.35
, tennis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
has quality good 0.80
is great 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baseball, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(baseball, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tennis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baseball, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golf, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golf, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golf, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tennis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(golf club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(golf, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(golf, is great)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(golf, is great)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(golf, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(golf, is great)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(golf, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(golf, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(baseball, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tennis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(golf, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(baseball, has quality good)