golf: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, tournament
Weight: 0.59
, baseball
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golf club
Weight: 0.71
, golf course
Weight: 0.38
, golfing
Weight: 0.37
, professional football
Weight: 0.35
, tennis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
be good for business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baseball, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(baseball, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tennis, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baseball, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tennis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tennis, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(golf club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf club, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(golf, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(golf, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(golf, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(golf, be good for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(golf, is great)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golf, be good for business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(golf, be good for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(golf, be good for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(golf, is great)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(golf, is great)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(golf, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golf, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(baseball, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tennis, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(golf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(baseball, has quality good)