golf: is less popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, tournament
Weight: 0.59
, baseball
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golf club
Weight: 0.71
, golf course
Weight: 0.38
, golfing
Weight: 0.37
, professional football
Weight: 0.35
, tennis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less popular 1.00
become less popular 0.95
is popular 0.86
be more expensive than jetta 0.86
is expensive 0.78
be popular among people like trump 0.78
become more accessible 0.77
be more expensive in morning 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tournament, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sport, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(baseball, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sport, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tournament, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(baseball, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tournament, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sport, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sport, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf club, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf course, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golf, is less popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golf, is less popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tournament, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golf, is less popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golf, is less popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tennis, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tennis, is popular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf course, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf course, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf club, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf club, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(golf, is less popular)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(golf, become less popular)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(golf, become less popular)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(golf, be more expensive than jetta)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(golf, become less popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(golf, be more expensive than jetta)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(golf, become less popular)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(golf, be more expensive than jetta)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(golf, be more expensive than jetta)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(golf, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(golf, be more expensive in morning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(golf, be more expensive in morning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(golf, be more expensive in morning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(golf, be more expensive in morning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(golf, become more accessible)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(golf, be popular among people like trump)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(golf, become more accessible)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(golf, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golf, be popular among people like trump)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(golf, become more accessible)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(golf, be popular among people like trump)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(golf, is popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(golf, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(golf, be popular among people like trump)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(golf, become more accessible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(golf, is less popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball, is popular)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tournament, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tennis, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf course, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(golf club, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball, is popular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(golf, is less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tournament, is expensive)