golfer: were treated by golfers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.50
, sportsman
Weight: 0.49
, golf club
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tennis player
Weight: 0.36
, football player
Weight: 0.35
, hockey player
Weight: 0.35
, soccer player
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated by golfers 1.00
were treated by white golfers 0.99
need caddies 0.79
use caddies 0.78
be considered athletes 0.75
need tee 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(golfer, were treated by white golfers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(golfer, need caddies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(golfer, need tee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(golfer, be considered athletes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(golfer, need tee)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(golfer, were treated by white golfers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(golfer, need caddies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(golfer, need tee)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(golfer, be considered athletes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(golfer, be considered athletes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golfer, be considered athletes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golfer, were treated by white golfers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(golfer, need tee)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(golfer, need caddies)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(golfer, need caddies)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(golfer, were treated by white golfers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(golfer, were treated by golfers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(golfer, were treated by golfers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(golfer, were treated by golfers)