gonorrhea: be bacterial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.66
, infection
Weight: 0.62
, bacterium
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, urinary tract
Weight: 0.55
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.37
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.36
, staphylococcus aureus
Weight: 0.36
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bacterial 1.00
is bacterial 1.00
is bacterial infection 0.95
is infection 0.77
be resistant to antibiotics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(gonorrhea, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, be resistant to antibiotics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, be bacterial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, be bacterial)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)