good person: be referred to hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.39
, trey
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred to hot 1.00
be referred to as hot 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(good person, be referred to hot)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(good person, be referred to as hot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(good person, be referred to as hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(good person, be referred to as hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(good person, be referred to as hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(good person, be referred to hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(good person, be referred to hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(good person, be referred to hot)