google: be better than bing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.68
, web site
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.65
, url
Weight: 0.64
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.38
, web
Weight: 0.36
, yahoo
Weight: 0.36
, aol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bing 1.00
be actually better than bing 0.98
be actually considered better than bing 0.96
become like more bing 0.94
go to bing 0.94
be much better than yahoo 0.83
be different than google 0.80
be different than american google 0.79
be ca different from google service 0.77
be ca different from regular google service 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(yahoo, be better than bing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(yahoo, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(yahoo, be better than bing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(google, be better than bing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than yahoo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(google, be ca different from regular google service)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(google, be much better than yahoo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(google, be ca different from regular google service)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than yahoo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(google, be ca different from regular google service)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(google, be much better than yahoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(google, be ca different from regular google service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(google, be better than bing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(google, be better than bing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(google, be better than bing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(yahoo, be better than bing)