google: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.68
, web site
Weight: 0.67
, web browser
Weight: 0.65
, url
Weight: 0.64
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.38
, web
Weight: 0.36
, yahoo
Weight: 0.36
, aol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be much better than answerscom 0.84
be much better than anwerscom 0.84
be much better than askcom 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(url, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(url, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(url, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aol, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(url, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(google, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(google, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(aol, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(google, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(google, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(google, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(google, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(google, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(google, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(google, be much better than askcom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(google, be much better than answerscom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(google, be much better than askcom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(google, be much better than answerscom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than askcom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than answerscom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than anwerscom)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than askcom)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(google, be much better than answerscom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(url, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aol, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(url, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)